GPU Performance

The P35X is certainly not the first system we have seen with the NVIDIA GTX980M GPU inside, but it is currently the thinnest notebook to sport the highest tier GPU from NVIDIA. We have seen the GTX980M in two other systems so far. The MSI GT72 has it, but that is a 17.3 inch device with a weight of 3.82 kg or 8.4 lbs. The Clevo P750ZM is a 15.6 inch device, but weighs almost as much as the larger MSI, at 3.4 kg or 7.48 lbs. The P35X is only 2.2-2.3 kg (4.85-5.07 lbs) depending on configuration, which puts it much closer in mass to the 2015 Razer Blade, but the Blade only has a GTX970M GPU.

So we know that the GTX980M is a potent GPU, but can the P35X handle this much GPU in such a small chassis? That comes down to system cooling, and we will dig into that soon, but for now, let’s take a look at how the P35X handles gaming. First we will look at our synthetic tests, and then move on to some gaming workloads.

3DMark

Futuremark 3DMark (2013)

Futuremark 3DMark (2013)

Futuremark 3DMark (2013)

Futuremark 3DMark (2013)

Futuremark 3DMark 11

The P35X does very well in 3DMark, scoring right in line with the other GTX980M devices. On Fire Strike in particular, which is the most demanding test that we run from 3DMark, you can see there is a very big gap between the 980M in the P35X and the 970M in the Razer Blade. Let’s move on to actual gaming workloads now.

Bioshock Infinite

Bioshock Infinite - Enthusiast

Although Bioshock Infinite is getting a bit long in the tooth, it is still a fantastic game, and on maximum settings it can still tax even the fastest gaming laptops. On this test, the P35X slots in right behind the Clevo which is a great result. The smaller chassis does not seem to affect performance.

GRID Autosport

GRID Autosport - Enthusiast

This is a new addition to our notebook suite, and as such we have only a few results available to compare against. The P35X can very easily run this game at over 60 FPS though, so no worries here.

Civilization: Beyond Earth

Civilization: Beyond Earth - Enthusiast

Another new addition to our 2015 gaming suite, this is the latest in the very popular Civilization series. We only have a couple of data points right now, but even at our Enthusiast settings, the P35X does very well here.

Shadow of Mordor

Shadow of Mordor - Enthusiast

We have a couple more new additions coming for our 2015 gaming suite, but the final one for today (due to a lack of data points on the others) is Shadow of Mordor. At 66.8 FPS, the P35X even outperforms the Clevo on this test.

Metro Last Light

Metro: Last Light - Enthusiast

4A Games has created one of our most demanding titles in Metro Last Light. The P35X scores very close to the P750ZM in this test, but neither of them can crack the elusive 60 FPS mark at this setting.

Tomb Raider

Tomb Raider - Enthusiast

One of my favorite games in some time was Tomb Raider. At maximum settings, it can offer a lot of options that can bring slower cards to their knees, especially when TressFX is enabled like it is on our Enthusiast setting. However the P35X handles this game like a champ.

High Resolution Gaming

One of the things I mentioned earlier in the review is that Gigabyte has an optional display with a resolution of 2880x1620, and that this can benefit gaming. Razer’s Blade has a 3200x1800 panel, and while much sharper on the desktop, the GTX970M can struggle at such a high resolution. The P35X has around a million less pixels to deal with than a 3200x1800 panel, and it has a stronger GPU than the Razer Blade. It is also far less pixels to deal with than something like the Clevo which has a 4K display. So in theory, you should be able to game with reasonable settings at the native resolution of the panel. To see how well the P35X performs at this resolution, here is a chart of how it does with the detail settings listed beside the title.

High DPI Gaming Results

There can be a significant decrease in framerate moving up to 2880x1620, but the GTX980M has enough headroom that most of our gaming suite is fairly playable. For those that are not, the GeForce Experience should help customize the settings for better performance. NVIDIA has made a big jump in performance with the GTX980M, and the P35X takes advantage of that, and couples it with a great display.

System Performance Battery Life and Wi-Fi
Comments Locked

55 Comments

View All Comments

  • xilience - Thursday, April 23, 2015 - link

    Any thoughts for why there is such a large difference in FPS in GRID:Autosport versus the Clevo?
  • SpaceRanger - Thursday, April 23, 2015 - link

    From the looks of it.. The Clevo is sporting a true 4790k(84w), while the Gigabyte's using a 4710HQ(47w) CPU. Apples and Oranges comparison in my eyes.
  • nerd1 - Thursday, April 23, 2015 - link

    It's as slow as razer blade with 970M - which means the whole system throttles a lot under pressure, even compared to razer blade (which is not well known for great cooling)
  • Brett Howse - Thursday, April 23, 2015 - link

    That's not what it means at all. It means that GRID Autosport is more CPU bound. The Clevo with the desktop CPU is way ahead. Razer has a faster CPU and slower GPU, but it's still behind.
  • xKrNMBoYx - Friday, April 24, 2015 - link

    Okay so some of the benchmarks include the MSI GT72 Dominator Pro with basically the same CPU and GPU. Yet all those benchmarks show the P35X beating the GT72 even though they are similar. So if a thin P35X can beat a more roomy GT72 with better cooling how is the P35X suffering from throttling issues?

    The next thing to come to mind logically would be the comparison of the CPUs as the Clevo is using a full 4790K that can run all cores on 4GHz and then the 4720HQ (Razerblade) which is better than the 4710HQ (P34X). Every benchmark here shows the 980M in the P35X beating the 970M by at least ~10FPS and you look at one benchmark where the difference is less than 10FPS and say they perform the same?
  • Frumious1 - Friday, April 24, 2015 - link

    Different drivers would be the reason. GT72 was tested when GTX 980M was practically brand new. NVIDIA had several driver updates that provided substantial increases to performance since last October/November. Too bad AnandTech can't go back and retest some of their previous laptops and update performance with the latest drivers.
  • xKrNMBoYx - Monday, April 27, 2015 - link

    You're right. I was hoping/expecting they did those tests over again. The lastest driver update did boost the desktop Maxwell GPU performances. Seeing that I do have a GT72 Pro with a 980M I should be able to try running a few of these game benchmarks to see if I get similar numbers.
  • nerd1 - Thursday, April 23, 2015 - link

    This review looks extremely shallow - it almost skipped over its main concern (thermal). A single 3D game for thermal testing? Seriously? Since when Anandtech review became like this?
  • hfm - Thursday, April 23, 2015 - link

    At least the system cooling solution noise was mentioned, which sounds like a deal-breaker in my eyes.
  • nerd1 - Thursday, April 23, 2015 - link

    Games rarely utilize CPU at all, and many games do not push GPU either. Most other hardware sites uses synthetic tests designed to really push the hardware, and then tests a number of demanding games too.

    And face it, you cannot cram x80M GPU and quadcore CPU inside 20mm thin body and expect it to run cool and silent. Even 17 inch gaming rigs sometimes throttle.

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now