Western Digital Caviar Green 3TB and My Book Essential 3TB Drives Reviewed
by Anand Lal Shimpi on October 19, 2010 1:43 PM EST- Posted in
- Storage
- HDDs
- Western Digital
- 3TB
SYSMark 2007
To help round out our real world performance testing I'm also including results from SYSMark 2007. This benchmark measures performance as a function of response time in applications varying including Adobe's CS2 suite, Microsoft Office and 3dsmax.
SYSMark performance echoes what we saw in PCMark, the 3TB drive doesn't seem to do so well under normal system workloads. This is really a drive for true mass storage, not active use as a boot/application drive.
Facebook
Twitter
RSS
48 Comments
View All Comments
krumme - Tuesday, October 19, 2010 - link
Can we perhaps see this in a My Book World Edition?Thanx for the fine HD reviews Anand
ervinshiznit - Tuesday, October 19, 2010 - link
So with the 32 bit LBA restriction, does this mean that its possible to boot from a partition on a 3TB drive as long as that partition is no larger than 2.1TB?davepermen - Tuesday, October 19, 2010 - link
And it's especially nice that the old small 2TB drives are now really cheap. Put a new one to celebrate into my windows home server. The 3TB ones won't be supported for whs1 anyways, so it's cheap 2TB drives from now on.Then, when the 3TB will be in the same price/gb ratio, the next disk will be needed, and whs2 will be there, supporting them.
And yes, storage (in my case, networked storage thanks to whs) + ssd in the systems is definitely the best setup. 100% agreed.
ratbert1 - Tuesday, October 19, 2010 - link
"The controller supports booting to a 3TB formatted drive if your motherboard has EFI support."The chart shows support for boot with 64 bit Vista and 7 with the HBA controller. If you have 32 bit, you can use it as a data drive.
SteelCity1981 - Tuesday, October 19, 2010 - link
It's totally pointless to make 6gb platter hard drives. At least WD understands that.Taft12 - Tuesday, October 19, 2010 - link
Nobody makes 6GB/platter drives... at least not since 1999!SteelCity1981 - Wednesday, October 20, 2010 - link
I'm talking speed not size duh.Roland00Address - Tuesday, October 19, 2010 - link
Western Digital Caviar Black WD6402AAEX 640GB 7200 RPM SATA 6.0Gb/s 3.5"Western Digital Caviar Black WD1002FAEX 1TB 7200 RPM SATA 6.0Gb/s 3.5"
Western Digital VelociRaptor WD4500HLHX 450GB 10000 RPM SATA 6.0Gb/s 3.5"
Western Digital VelociRaptor WD6000HLHX 600GB 10000 RPM SATA 6.0Gb/s 3.5"
bennyg - Saturday, October 23, 2010 - link
If you were uninformed, you would think a SATA 6GBPS 3TB HDD is faster than a SATA 3GBPS 3TB HDD. So marketing people think it's very useful.ytoledano1 - Tuesday, October 19, 2010 - link
In most cases, data is lost due to user error, virus, theft or fire - RAID1 protects against none of these. RAID1 will protect you against disk failure, but its main advantage is in mission-critical servers where you don't want to reboot the machine when replacing a drive. How many desktop users need this feature?Worst, people might think that their data is backed up 'cause their disk is redundant. It's not.