The Gigabyte P35X v3 Review: Slim GTX980M Gaming Laptop
by Brett Howse on April 23, 2015 8:00 AM ESTDesign
If I had to compare the P35X to another gaming system, the first that would come to mind would be the Razer Blade, which is fairly high praise. The body and lid of the system are black aluminum, and the overall finish is very similar. Obviously the P35X is quite a bit larger than the 14 inch Blade, but if I had to guess where they took inspiration from it would be the Razer. However inspiration and execution can be very different, and Gigabyte has certainly gone their own route on the design.
Gigabyte looks to have gone to great lengths to make the P35X as thin as they could. With a 47 watt CPU, and the most powerful notebook GPU available right now, there are certainly limits as to how far you can take it, so one way in which Gigabyte has shaved some thickness off of the device is by making the laptop lid very thin. What that does mean though is that the lid is not very sturdy, and on such a large display, it is very easy to get a lot of flex. The hinges are fairly light to operate though so normally this is not a big deal. The hinges do not need to be very stiff because the display lacks a touch digitizer, so unless you are one of those people that pokes at your display, the resistance on the hinges are just about perfect. They have also added a small lip at the top of the display to assist with opening.
The underside of the P35X features six feet to keep the laptop stable, and they are thick enough to keep the laptop elevated for air circulation. In the center of the device is the access port for getting to the memory, and the entire bottom will come off if you ever need access to storage or other components. The fourth storage bay is at the front, and the included DVD drive can be removed and replaced with a 2.5 inch disk drive.
Inside, and at the back, is the cooling system for the P35X. Keeping these components cool can be quite a challenge, so Gigabyte has gone with a dual-heat pipe and dual-fan configuration. Cool air is drawn in from the front and underneath, and exhausted out two very large grilles at the rear of the device.
On the left side is the RJ-45 jack for wired networking, along with the SD card slot, two USB 2.0 ports, and the headphone and microphone jacks. The right side has two USB 3.0 ports, the charging port, and the plethora of video connectors. Not too many devices these days have support for every PC video connector, but the P35X hits them all with a VGA connector, HDMI, and DisplayPort, and the mini DisplayPort output supports 4K at 60 Hz.
The display bezels are quite large, especially on the top and bottom, and unlike most of the laptop, they are black plastic. The large size is to accommodate the DVD drive at the front of the laptop, but It feels like a DVD drive in 2015 is not really necessary though, nor is using the slot for a fourth storage bay really something that most people will require, You can already get a lot of storage in the first three. Gigabyte could have trimmed down the dimensions a bit of they opted to forgo this, and increase mobility.
The keyboard has two backlight levels and is large enough to accommodate a number pad. The Zero on the number pad is only half of its normal width though because the arrow keys have been crammed in against it. There is a pile of empty space on the right side of the keyboard deck, and a better solution would be to offset the arrow keys down a bit. Perhaps it is a habit I could unlearn, but when I use a number pad I tend to hit the zero key on the left side, which would likely move my cursor instead of entering a number. The rest of the keys are not the best either, with fairly limited key travel despite the thickness of the laptop. Key strokes were a bit mushy too, but if I needed to type quickly, it never seemed to cause much of an issue.
Gigabyte’s trackpad is an Elan model, and the pad material is very smooth and easy to glide over. Gigabyte has chosen to go with a clickpad for the P35X, and with the real estate available I wish they had gone with dedicated buttons. Using the trackpad was not a fantastic experience, and several times it missed taps, and double taps would end up not registering. It is hard to explain why after all of these years, basic trackpad use can still be so challenging, but here we are. If I was gaming on the P35X, I would likely use a dedicated mouse anyway.
Styling is very subjective, but I do like the look of the P35X compared to many gaming systems out there. It is subtle and understated, which I like. However the execution of the design leaves a bit to be desired, and Gigabyte would do well to re-examine their keyboard and trackpad. As the primary input methods on a $2000 laptop, they really need to be top notch.
55 Comments
View All Comments
xilience - Thursday, April 23, 2015 - link
Any thoughts for why there is such a large difference in FPS in GRID:Autosport versus the Clevo?SpaceRanger - Thursday, April 23, 2015 - link
From the looks of it.. The Clevo is sporting a true 4790k(84w), while the Gigabyte's using a 4710HQ(47w) CPU. Apples and Oranges comparison in my eyes.nerd1 - Thursday, April 23, 2015 - link
It's as slow as razer blade with 970M - which means the whole system throttles a lot under pressure, even compared to razer blade (which is not well known for great cooling)Brett Howse - Thursday, April 23, 2015 - link
That's not what it means at all. It means that GRID Autosport is more CPU bound. The Clevo with the desktop CPU is way ahead. Razer has a faster CPU and slower GPU, but it's still behind.xKrNMBoYx - Friday, April 24, 2015 - link
Okay so some of the benchmarks include the MSI GT72 Dominator Pro with basically the same CPU and GPU. Yet all those benchmarks show the P35X beating the GT72 even though they are similar. So if a thin P35X can beat a more roomy GT72 with better cooling how is the P35X suffering from throttling issues?The next thing to come to mind logically would be the comparison of the CPUs as the Clevo is using a full 4790K that can run all cores on 4GHz and then the 4720HQ (Razerblade) which is better than the 4710HQ (P34X). Every benchmark here shows the 980M in the P35X beating the 970M by at least ~10FPS and you look at one benchmark where the difference is less than 10FPS and say they perform the same?
Frumious1 - Friday, April 24, 2015 - link
Different drivers would be the reason. GT72 was tested when GTX 980M was practically brand new. NVIDIA had several driver updates that provided substantial increases to performance since last October/November. Too bad AnandTech can't go back and retest some of their previous laptops and update performance with the latest drivers.xKrNMBoYx - Monday, April 27, 2015 - link
You're right. I was hoping/expecting they did those tests over again. The lastest driver update did boost the desktop Maxwell GPU performances. Seeing that I do have a GT72 Pro with a 980M I should be able to try running a few of these game benchmarks to see if I get similar numbers.nerd1 - Thursday, April 23, 2015 - link
This review looks extremely shallow - it almost skipped over its main concern (thermal). A single 3D game for thermal testing? Seriously? Since when Anandtech review became like this?hfm - Thursday, April 23, 2015 - link
At least the system cooling solution noise was mentioned, which sounds like a deal-breaker in my eyes.nerd1 - Thursday, April 23, 2015 - link
Games rarely utilize CPU at all, and many games do not push GPU either. Most other hardware sites uses synthetic tests designed to really push the hardware, and then tests a number of demanding games too.And face it, you cannot cram x80M GPU and quadcore CPU inside 20mm thin body and expect it to run cool and silent. Even 17 inch gaming rigs sometimes throttle.