Gaming Performance: 1080p

Moving along, here's a look at a more balanced gaming scenario, running games at 1080p with maximum image quality.

Note: We are currently benchmarking more processors as we speak, so we will update these graphs as the results come in. It may take hours or days, but more data points are coming.

 

(b-0) Company of Heroes 3 - 1080p Maximum - Average FPS

(b-1) Company of Heroes 3 - 1080p Maximum - 95th Percentile

(b-2) Cyberpunk 2077 - 1080p Ultra - Average FPS

(b-3) Cyberpunk 2077 - 1080p Ultra - 95th Percentile

(b-4) F1 2023 (Bahrain) - 1080p Ultra - Average FPS

(b-5) F1 2023 (Bahrain) - 1080p Ultra - 95th Percentile

(b-6) Returnal - 1080p Epic - Average FPS

(b-7) Returnal - 1080p Epic - 95th Percentile

(b-8) TW Warhammer 3 - 1080p Ultra - Average FPS

(b-9) TW Warhammer 3 - 1080p Ultra - 95th Percentile

Moving onto performance at 1080p with our MSI GeForce RTX 4080 Gaming X graphics card, the chips become a lot more competitive. In Company of Heroes 3, we see this title favoring the Core i9-14900K with its higher core count, faster cores, and, ultimately, more power available under the hood. Overall the Ryzen 7 9700X and Ryzen 5 9600X remain competitive.

Gaming Performance: 720p Gaming Performance: 4K
Comments Locked

70 Comments

View All Comments

  • Golgatha777 - Wednesday, August 7, 2024 - link

    Thanks for the review. I personally would have liked to see a 7800X3D in the benchmarks. Also, I would have omitted 720p and replaced it with 1440p gaming benchmarks. 1080p is perfectly fine for a synthetic benchmark to see which CPU is faster overall and a lot of gamers run 1440p.
  • kpb321 - Wednesday, August 7, 2024 - link

    Agreed. The 7800X3D should be very close in price to the 9700X so having both in the gaming charts would be pretty nice. Offhand I assume it will be a mix. For standard game the 9700x should have a small lead due to the Zen 5 improvements. For things that are cache sensitive that will make the 7800X3D more competitive or even faster.
  • heffeque - Wednesday, August 7, 2024 - link

    It doesn't make sense.
    The 7800X3D should be compared to the 9800X3D (which will come in a few months).
  • Trackster11230 - Wednesday, August 7, 2024 - link

    It makes sense to compare the 7800X3D to the 9700X due to price, and I'm sure it'll be compared against the 9800X3D when it comes out too. These aren't mutually exclusive.
  • Klober - Wednesday, August 7, 2024 - link

    Seriously? Did none of you pay attention to the charts? There's clearly a 7800X3D in all but 2 of the charts on this page alone. I could maybe see an argument made for the 7900X3D (coincidentally, the CPU I have which I why I noted it's missing) but not the 7800X3D.
  • Trackster11230 - Wednesday, August 7, 2024 - link

    Yes, I see it in the charts, hence my comment about it making sense being in here. It's similar in price to the 9700X, so it makes sense to compare from that metric. What's so difficult to understand?

    I could make an argument too that an 8c/16t CPU makes more sense to compare to than the 7900X3D with 12c/24t.
  • boozed - Wednesday, August 7, 2024 - link

    Seems odd that the gaming CPU is missing from the gaming results
  • boozed - Thursday, August 8, 2024 - link

    "Note: We are currently benchmarking more processors as we speak"

    I should read harder
  • Oxford Guy - Friday, August 16, 2024 - link

    They said that they would re-test the Intel chips over the weekend in May. Did those updated benchmarks ever get done and published?
  • frshi - Wednesday, August 7, 2024 - link

    The table says Quad Channel DDR support, I don't think that's true. It's 4 slots but it's dual channel, isn't it?

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now