System Performance

Not all motherboards are created equal. On the face of it, they should all perform the same and differ only in the functionality they provide - however, this is not the case. The obvious pointers are power consumption, but also the ability for the manufacturer to optimize USB speed, audio quality (based on audio codec), POST time and latency. This can come down to manufacturing process and prowess, so these are tested.

For Z390 we are running an updated version of our test suite, including OS and CPU cooler. This has some effect on our results.

Power Consumption

Power consumption was tested on the system while in a single ASUS GTX 980 GPU configuration with a wall meter connected to the Thermaltake 1200W power supply. This power supply has ~75% efficiency > 50W, and 90%+ efficiency at 250W, suitable for both idle and multi-GPU loading. This method of power reading allows us to compare the power management of the UEFI and the board to supply components with power under load, and includes typical PSU losses due to efficiency. These are the real world values that consumers may expect from a typical system (minus the monitor) using this motherboard.

While this method for power measurement may not be ideal, and you feel these numbers are not representative due to the high wattage power supply being used (we use the same PSU to remain consistent over a series of reviews, and the fact that some boards on our test bed get tested with three or four high powered GPUs), the important point to take away is the relationship between the numbers. These boards are all under the same conditions, and thus the differences between them should be easy to spot.

Power: Long Idle (w/ GTX 980)Power: OS Idle (w/ GTX 980)Power: Prime95 Blend (w/ GTX 980)

In a long idle power state, both the ASUS ROG Strix Z390-I Gaming and ASRock Z390 Phantom Gaming-ITX/ac perform well, however in an OS idle state, the Phantom Gaming board was very power hungry; the hungriest so far in our Z390 tests. At full load, both boards both performed competitively within 3% of each other and sit towards the middle of our graphs.

Non-UEFI POST Time

Different motherboards have different POST sequences before an operating system is initialized. A lot of this is dependent on the board itself, and POST boot time is determined by the controllers on board (and the sequence of how those extras are organized). As part of our testing, we look at the POST Boot Time using a stopwatch. This is the time from pressing the ON button on the computer to when Windows starts loading. (We discount Windows loading as it is highly variable given Windows specific features.)

Non UEFI POST Time

The ASUS ROG Strix Z390-I Gaming managed to record the fastest POST time from any of the LGA1151 motherboards tested so far, both at stock settings and with controllers disabled. Just behind it is the ASRock Z390 Phantom Gaming-ITX/ac by a couple of seconds, but still ahead of most of the boards previously tested.

DPC Latency

Deferred Procedure Call latency is a way in which Windows handles interrupt servicing. In order to wait for a processor to acknowledge the request, the system will queue all interrupt requests by priority. Critical interrupts will be handled as soon as possible, whereas lesser priority requests such as audio will be further down the line. If the audio device requires data, it will have to wait until the request is processed before the buffer is filled.

If the device drivers of higher priority components in a system are poorly implemented, this can cause delays in request scheduling and process time. This can lead to an empty audio buffer and characteristic audible pauses, pops and clicks. The DPC latency checker measures how much time is taken processing DPCs from driver invocation. The lower the value will result in better audio transfer at smaller buffer sizes. Results are measured in microseconds.

Deferred Procedure Call Latency

Not a single of the LGA1151 models we've tested thus far has been optimized for DPC latency, but both the mini-ITX sized boards on test managed to perform better than the rest of the pack. The Z390 Phantom Gaming-ITX/ac came out on top with the Strix Z390-I Gaming not too far behind.

Test Bed and Setup CPU Performance, Short Form
Comments Locked

26 Comments

View All Comments

  • Marlin1975 - Tuesday, February 12, 2019 - link

    Great review, thanks.

    Cheaper and seems better overall, ASRock for the win.
  • goatfajitas - Tuesday, February 12, 2019 - link

    Isnt ASRock just the lower end brandname from Asus? Same basic parts.
  • LiquidSilverZ - Tuesday, February 12, 2019 - link

    No, they are a separate brand.
  • Korguz - Tuesday, February 12, 2019 - link

    desperate brand.. that was a spin off of Asus to compete in the OEM market in 2002, and has since expanded into the non oem market :-)
  • goatfajitas - Tuesday, February 12, 2019 - link

    Separate brand, yes. Same company though. Like Honda/Acura or Toyota/Lexus.
  • jeremyshaw - Tuesday, February 12, 2019 - link

    Nah, ASUS gave up ownership years ago.
  • goatfajitas - Tuesday, February 12, 2019 - link

    Did they? I wasn't aware. Still likely use alot of the same parts from the same sources. For example, the similar parts above.
  • eva02langley - Tuesday, February 12, 2019 - link

    Same company pal...
  • Korguz - Wednesday, February 13, 2019 - link

    asus and asrock are seperate companies, owned by different owners, ASrock, is owned by pegatron.
  • FSWKU - Wednesday, February 13, 2019 - link

    Who Asus still farms their warranty repairs out to (along with Atan Gtech)

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now