A First Look at the HTPC Case Genre with the Ahanix D.Vine 4
by Purav Sanghani on October 10, 2004 1:00 PM EST- Posted in
- Cases/Cooling/PSUs
Internal Design
Comparing mid-tower cases to HTPC cases is like comparing apples to oranges, which is why we have started a fresh new board to compare the various HTPC cases out there. To understand better the layout of an HTPC case, we needed to first become familiar with the design of a single home theater component.We notice that each component in a home audio/video setup is a single unit, which is about 17" in width and can range in depth from 6"-17" depending on the component. This helps keep a consistent look when lining each unit up on a shelf and gives the entire display an organized look.
In order for this to be the case for an HTPC chassis, the motherboard and drive bays as well as the power supply would all need to be mounted both to utilize space efficiently as well as in a technologically feasible manner for that particular component.
Click to enlarge.
Looking at the insides of the D.Vine 4, we see that the motherboard is, of course, laid to rest at the bottom of the case. The power supply would be mounted at the back right of the chassis, which is where it would normally be on a mid-tower case when standing upright.
Click to enlarge.
The drive bays are all at the front of the chassis, but are limited to two to three 5-1/4" drive bays and two to three 3-1/2" drive bays, which are organized horizontally to utilize space efficiently as well as positioning components to operate to manufacturer specifications. Ahanix has implemented a three 5-1/4" bay design while limiting hard drive mounts to two bays. This should be ample in an HTPC setup, since they can be networked to, say, a media server or other PCs around the area, but the D.Vine 4 could have been expanded to four 3-1/2" bays to utilize the remaining space better.<
Facebook
Twitter
RSS
21 Comments
View All Comments
rafaelaustin - Friday, October 29, 2004 - link
Heat and noise are the enemies of an HTPC. The temperatures displayed in this test seem exceptionally low for what I've seen reported by others, usually around 55c. Try this with an Intel CPU or a "slimline" case and see what happens. The 520W Powerstream is overkill. Also, where is the TV tuner? It needs a Hauppauge PVR-250 to make this a real HTPC.rafaelaustin - Friday, October 29, 2004 - link
geogecko - Wednesday, October 20, 2004 - link
When can we expect to see a more comprehensive review of HTPC cases?Some interesting units out there on the net that would be good choices for review, IMO:
http://www.atechfabrication.com/
http://www.ahanix.com/ (other newer options)
http://www.silverstonetek.com/
And especially the new HT-400 from:
http://www.kanam.co.kr/
Bochista - Wednesday, October 13, 2004 - link
My recent purchase of an HDTV puts me in a position where an HTPC would be useful, but I don't think some of the things I intend to do are considered in this review. Some things were hit on however, and I hope to see more cases with these features.1. I need LOTS of storage. Archives of my HD Tivo will take up quite a bit of room.
2. I want to play games on my 62 inch TV, so I need thermals for serious video cards as well.
3. The IR reciever for remote is nice.
4. The ability to have an LED panel acknowledge commands from the remote, display track/time of a movie etc. Also, the ability to dim during movie watching so as to be less of a distraction.
5. Silent Cooling.
pshrink - Wednesday, October 13, 2004 - link
"Another feature that Ahanix has managed to implement, and others should follow suit, is the IrDA transceiver"I can't see anything like a IrDA transceiver in the pictures, and I can't find any info on Ahanix's web site with regard to built-in IrDA capability. Someone please clarify.
tagaste - Wednesday, October 13, 2004 - link
Amen. Why make it seem like the temperatures are a problem when they aren't? They aren't even close. Perhaps the review has to appear 'balanced' but surely perfectly normal operating temperatures shouldn't be given anything like the same weight as ease of access, noise levels, and aesthetic considerations. When normally-clocked HTPCs actually start failing because of heat from poor ventilation or Johnny burns his hand on the case, then it's time to talk about "thermal issues."iwilson - Tuesday, October 12, 2004 - link
The thermal testing is nonsense. An HTPC places noise control a lot higher in importance than thermal load. The temps quoted are nowhere near the level of causing a problem with any of the components. My HTPC has run for several years with less fans than in the article with absolutely no problems. As long as the PC is stable I couldn't care less if the temperature was 500 degrees inside.Case I use is here btw http://www.kanam.co.kr/html/htpc.htm
Bookie - Monday, October 11, 2004 - link
I'm glad you guys are spending more time with the htpc market. I'd like to see a review of silverstone's htpc case. I'm getting ready to drop a lot of money on a new entertainment system (plasma, htpc, and the works), and just want to make the right decision. I'm very interested in the lc02 (black: http://www.silverstonetek.com/products-lc02.htm) with a matx setup, but all the reviews I've read try to fit a full sized mb with all the xtras (unecessary if you ask me). I think that something like this with a mobile processor (mobile athlon 35watt probably) would be the best setup.CrabbyGuy - Monday, October 11, 2004 - link
I think that AnandTech's thermal tests very much need expansion for HTPC cases. Very few people will build a PC in a case like this and then leave it freestanding. Rather, HTPCs will be stacked on (or even under) other home theater components and are likely to be installed in cabinets closed at the rear without fans in many living rooms. Testing the cases' thermals in these situations would be very helpful to many of us. Also, recommendations such as, "Put a fan pulling at least 25CFM behind the right-hand side of the case when installing in a closed cabinet and do not operate an HTPC installed in this case without its being open at the front," would seem especially useful. The alternative is either trial and error or component failure for many users.CrabbyGuy - Monday, October 11, 2004 - link